Friday, June 19, 2009

1949 Bowman #5, Hank Sauer

Today's guest played in 15 MLB seasons with a handful of teams, but most famously with Chicago, who acquired him at 1949's mid-point from Cincinnati. He looks a trifle old on this card because the Reds waited two seasons after his war service to promote Hank to the majors, including a AAA year with 50 homers. Not one to waste time, Sauer blasted another 35 during his rookie year of 1948.


Card front

Hank won 1952's closely contested National League MVP award, edging out pitchers Robin Roberts (Phillies) and Joe Black (Dodgers) and setting career highs in total bases (301), RBIs (131), and OPS+ (143). Oddly enough, he hit just as well two years later--at age 37!--but finished 26th in the MVP race as Willie Mays dominated the batter's box, outfield, and voter's hearts.

Bowman's 1949 set gets a shrug of the shoulders from many collectors. Sure, it's a multi-series, 240-card issue from a major name, but why so lackluster? Bland backgrounds and mis-aligned color printing (apparent on the #5) dogged the whole set and made many players look hazy or just plain ugly. Cards backs include decent bios, but we're still a few years away from Topps' popularization of the stat grid.

I did learn something new researching the set, courtesy of collector Chris Stufflestreet. Normally, you expect companies to print a complete series, such as #1 through #72, all at once. In 1949, however, Bowman substituted #73 (Billy Cox) for #4 (Jerry Priddy) on their two 36-count printing sheets. This left a bedeviling early-season hole between #3 and #5 that no amount of collector purchases could fill until the next group of cards came along. It also explains why Priddy appears both with and without the "name on front" variation first seen in the second series. Summarily lame from a customer perspective, if relatively innocuous in the lens of history.

1949's Bowman proves tough to finish because of the scarce and numerous high series cards. I've been working on the set for more than 5 years and still need more than 30 of them. At $10+ each in lowest grade, that's quite an investment for an ugly duckling set. Fortunately, this Sauer cost me only $5 from eBay back in 2003. (A quick eBay search says they're about twice that now.)

No comments: